Severing heads of the dead enemy soldiers? I thought it was so medieval.
People who did that to the late Lance Naik Hemraj Singh's body must be severely punished.
Business Standard's leader on January 15 2013:
"News TV's martial music drowns out its responsibilities...It should go without saying that the media has a role in informing and educating a citizenry about the issues of the day, providing background, context and holding the powerful to account. A case study in how not to go about this is currently being provided by the electronic media in its coverage of recent raids and counter-raids on the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir, in which two Indian soldiers have been killed, and one allegedly subjected to post-mortem mutilation. Instead of questioning the narrative, news television and some print outlets have instead blatantly beaten the drums of confrontation, hyping even relatively calm statements by the army chief into belligerent displays of national machismo."
On December 7 1760, just before the third battle of Panipat that was fought on January 14 1761, Maratha chieftain Balwantrao Mehendale (बळवंतराव मेहेंदळे) was killed by the enemy. The enemy wanted to sever his head and present it to their leadership. A few brave Maratha soldiers prevented that from happening and his whole body was brought back to the camp.
(Read a related post on the subject here.)
Cutting enemy heads was almost the norm then. Maratha armies too occasionally indulged in the practice.
Last year a book titled "The Severed Head: Capital Vision" by Julie Kristeva, translated by Jody Gladding was published. It's about the way in which the severed head pops up in art, literature and real life.
Kathryn Hughes said in the review of the book for Guardian:
"Part of its fascination lies in the way it seems to offer a physical location for where our true self resides. Our face is what makes us knowable in the social world, our brain is what tells us who we are, and our speaking mouth is the conduit between the two. Lose our heads and we have lost everything, which is why the fact that we can come apart so easily is terrifying. It also explains a certain morbid fascination with how long a head can go on living after it has been severed."
Of all the books I read in my childhood, I remember those most which had memorable pictures. I have already mentioned a few of them before.
One such book was "Sheesamarthcharitramrut" (श्रीसमर्थचरित्रामृत).
It claims to be a biography of Samarth Ramdas (समर्थ रामदास) told through stories. It's 159 pages long and was published in 1958, 350th birth anniversary year of Samarth. Luckily, I still have it with me.
I must have read it dozens of times. I once knew almost all of its text by heart but I now only remember its pictures.
They were drawn by Chitrakalabhushan Mr. J B Dikshit (चित्रकलाभूषण श्री. जि. भि. दीक्षित). Mr. Dixit's contribution has been generously acknowledged by the editor of the book in the foreword.
It has a couple of pictures of severed head of Bholaram (भोळाराम), disciple of Samarth. They scared me a bit tn the beginning but I guess they also increased the book's appeal to the child in the long run.
'Bholaram cuts off his own head'
The story of Bholaram of course is a folktale/myth as are most of them in the collection.
In 17th century Maharashtra severed head was not all that bizarre. As seen earlier, one reads in battles involving Maratha armies, how the victors cut off the heads of the vanquished and carried them as trophies.
Battle was such an accepted motif then that even Tukaram (तुकाराम) says:
"वेढा वेढा रे पंढरी । मोर्चे लावा भीमातिरीं ॥1॥ चलाचला संत जन । करा देवासी भांडण ॥ध्रु.॥ लुटालुटा पंढरपूर। धरा रखुमाइऩचा वर ॥2॥ तुका ह्मणे चला । घाव निशानी घातला॥3॥"
(Hey besiege besiege Pandharpur, erect barricades (open fronts) on the banks of Bhima
come come devotees, spar with the god
Plunder, plunder Pandharpur, detain the husband of Rakhumai
Tukaram says let's go, we have hit the target)
I wonder if Mr. Dixit saw or studied the following picture?
David with the Head of Goliath, 1609–1610
Artist: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio
"Perhaps the most powerful and personal work that Caravaggio completed during his final months in Naples is his David with the Head of Goliath. Everything that Caravaggio knew about youth and age, cruelty and compassion, life and death, sex and suffering, has been poured, without hesitation or holding back, into this image of the delicate boy—probably the same one who modeled for the brooding Saint John the Baptist now in Rome’s Galleria Borghese- holding, at arm’s length, the head of the the bearded, shaggy, middle-aged man whom he has slain. The head of Goliath is Caravaggio’s last self-portrait. His features are thick and misshapen. One of his eyelids droops. On his forehead is a bloody wound, presumably the mark of the fatal stone from David’s slingshot, but which also suggests the disfiguring injuries the painter received when he was attacked at the Osteria del Cerriglio in Naples.,,
...Death has already frozen Goliath’s features into a rigid, Medusa-like mask, and what’s most disturbing is that death has given him no peace, no relief, no release from the agony and horror of his dying moments, from the shock of having been murdered by a boy so much like the youths whom, in more peaceful and less desperate times, Caravaggio would have loved."
(from 'Caravaggio / Painter of Miracles' by Francine Prose)
I have quoted above: "how long a head can go on living after it has been severed.".... Caravaggio's head still lives!